Charting a Path to Class Customization

As the news coming out of Austin continues to pick up speed, mining information is becoming much more exciting. The response to our recent speculation articles inspired us to delve deeper into what we were previously told about Star Wars: The Old Republic with surprising results. We used our recently acquired knowledge to give context to older news items, and realized BioWare was giving us hard facts all along.


A few years ago during the 2007 Austin GDC, Gamastura covered a speech by Gordon Walton, the co-studio director at BioWare Austin. It focused on how developers should approach making MMOs in a post World of Warcraft market, and towards the end of the presentation, Walton made the following comments to the crowd:

"The places to innovate are endless, but what do players want? Innovations have to be substantially better to be noticeable. Their game has eight classes, my game has 16. Who cares about classes? Do something Ive never done before. If nine out of 10 people cant tell its an innovation, its not an innovation."


In retrospect, this quote reveals a great deal about Star Wars: The Old Republic in light of what we recently learned about class skills. Given the fact that we know there are eight classes, and we speculated each class has two distinct paths of damage and support, we can now see why Walton mentioned the number 16 in 2007. BioWare is supplying many more classes then we previously believed.

Additionally, the focus on recognizable innovations by making them substantial allows us to speculate that the depth within these 16 classes will be far beyond what many MMO players are accustomed to. We should remember that this speech was based around developing games in a WoW-dominated world. In order to stand out, Dalton states a game would need to do more than just supply a little more of the same. We believe this means you will see far more customization within each TOR path then what we currently see in a single set of WoW class trees.

Using this hypothesis, we created a possible class progression chart based on what we knew of the Smuggler's paths:

smugpaths_s


We believe the class customization options will be extremely deep once a player chooses their particular path. So deep, in fact, a single specialty could contain the same relative complexity as an entire World of Warcraft class. Instead of three talent trees, you may have as many as nine talent trees to quickly move between when you want to adjust your play style. Such an intricate level of customization would fit with Gordon Walton's desire to stand out in the eyes of the MMO community, and fulfill BioWare's promise to give gamers a different, defined play experience.

This is how we arrived at nine talent trees per path: first, we looked at what we already knew about the two Smuggler paths, noting the Scoundrel had both a focus on Stealth and Medicine. With all the developer talk about not forcing you to do something, such as solely specializing in healing to be viable for group play, we arrived at the conclusion that there had to be a third specialty that enhanced the Scoundrel's ability to do damage.

We then went back to the trusty Holonet and noticed something in one of the Combat Tactics videos: a Smuggler quickly moves to get into closer range and wields a single weapon. Since we already said the Gunslinger was longer ranged, utilized Cover, and duel wields blasters, we hypothesized the third specialty in the Scoundrel path would focus on single weapon damage.

Smugg2


Referring back to Walton's quote again, we concluded only developing three talent trees would be much too limiting for the level of character customization BioWare was aiming for. To account for this, we gave each specialty the same multiple of three to get to nine talent trees. The result is an array of so much variety, depth, and versatility that we could imagine quickly re-arranging talent points for a particular situation, and then with equal speed, do the same for a different one.

We then added a possible alignment focused skill for each specialty. We were told previously that characters would have specific abilities linked to whether they are light, neutral/grey, or dark. A single skill for each specialty would fit, and allows each character to access three possible skills based on their class, path, and alignment.

While this is extremely speculative, we believe the information received from BioWare and LucasArts strongly points to such complexity. This elaborate customization would be a significant undertaking for any development studio, but the response would be amazing from players tired of limited options. If this is similar to the class design of Star Wars: The Old Republic, we could be looking forward to a future of astonishing theorycraft.

Update: Ginnel, a member of the official forums, created a thread earlier today that contains an interesting quote from the latest issue of Edge. The quote, shown below, further endorses the conclusions contained in this article. The emphasis on deep character development is seen in this excerpt, as well as restating how dramatic the choice between the Gunslinger damage path and the Scoundrel support path will be.

There's a dramatic amount of variation within classes. Using the example of the Smuggler, BioWare guided us through three or four paths of character development; every couple of levels brings with it a specialization path. Smugglers, for instance can specialize early on as Gunslingers with dual-wielding and coercion abilities, or Scoundrels with stealth and healing aptitude. Class choice affects the story arc far more than the actual gameplay it reflects who you want to be within The Old Republic's universe, not what you wish to do.

Comments

  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • #35
    This article is interesting, but there happens to be something you overlooked - each class has 1 tree that is shared with both specializations. In essence, instead of the six major lines, you should have 5, where both of them share the 'center' one derived from the base class. That is all.
  • #34
    I found this article to be really insightful well researched. I thought I would try to add a little further to the speculation =D
    Some classes seem to have some fairly obvious game choices that mesh perfectly with this hierarchy. For instance, the imperial agent could logically diverge into a more rogue-like stealthier utility/dps class, or as more of a single-target DPS sniper class. The trooper class seems to have some weapon specialization choices to make judging from the various weapons we've seen so far. I would say the speculation on JK/SW are right on the money with a more tank-like tree seeing better armor and a single lightsaber, and a DPS path with lesser armor dual weilding. Consulars/Inquisitors seem to lend themselves to caster specs, and my speculation would be healer/cc for the other main branch.
    All of the classes have exhibited some form of CC so that could make sense as a subset of particular specs and a strong choice for a PvP build. It's interesting that I haven't really noticed any buffing so far in the videos though I haven't scoured the UI with a magnifying glass looking for them.
    I have a strong feeling that, much like in many other MMOs to date, each normal class ability that you recieve in the early game will have an affinity toward one tree or another giving players a strong idea about which style of gameplay they would choose to pursue.
    One last note, I think that the companion system that is in place very strongly supports a DPS versus support choice since anyone who has ever leveled a purely support class (real holy priest) in an MMO has felt the pain that I'm confident Bioware won't inflict on us since you will be able to choose a companion that complements your characters role.
    Keep up the good work and keep the great reads coming!
  • #32
    Yeah and in the written interview here http://darthhater.com/2009/12/03/jake-neri-interview-part-two/#more-4843 He again mentions being able to switch between the paths once you have reached a certain level and unlocked them. Pretty much verifies that the path choices won't be permanent. But yeah besides that one point, solid write up imo.
  • #33
    Put those quotes in context with Walton saying "16 classes."

    It doesn't appear to us that BioWare changed direction in regards to class design since Walton said that.
  • #30
    Jake Neri even said in our interview that there wasn't official nomenclature, so I'm pretty sure the same word was used for two different things.

    If the path choices weren't permanent, then there would be less trees, and it doesn't make sense for something like that not to be permanent when you go back and read other stuff like Walton's quote.

    Hope that helps!
  • #26
    I have a question. Do you guys think there will be talent trees OUTSIDE of the specializations, like in Dragon Age? So we have smuggler core trees that are more numerous that specialization trees?
  • #27
    I think it is more like WoW where you learn core abilities and different ranks of them, and then after you make your path choice, you get to put points in your nine talent talent trees.
  • #28
    That makes sense. Would probably depend on how long till you make the choice though. For example, if it took a long while (like a couple dozen hours of gameplay), it would probably be best to have smuggler talent trees to have some variety. If its at level 10 or 15, it wouldn't really be necessary.

    *shrugs*
  • #29
    Maybe think of it this way: how can you make a choice like that... such a permanent one... without real knowledge of your class' depth, core abilities, and story?
  • #25
    interesting stuff guys, looks like another couple are taking it on full swing to give a bit more life (though through the roof speculation) to this idea: http://polyfx.com/swtor/ op: http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=101653
  • #24
    I dig your work here, I really do. But don't you think that 18 (eighteen) skill trees per class is a bit over the top? Of course it has to be considered how big you think these 18 trees are. I think there is no way that each of them is as complex as a WoW-class skill tree...
  • #20
    Cool, interesting read indeed. Thanks. :)

    So what's your take on the "themes" that have been mentioned? Apologies if I missed something obvious here, but I'm wondering if they could be more than just mere design categories and perhaps in some way are integrated into the actual class structure? I might be way off here, but it would be nice to hear what you guys make of it:

    "...each class is being designed around a number of different themes that can apparently be specialized in to customize your character around your playing style. The example given was the smuggler profession, whose general themes include luck, recklessness, opportunity, and cowboy."

    Source: http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/starwarstheoldrepublic/news.html?sid=6242790&mode=previews

    Again, not sure this is relevant, but I'm mentioning it just in case.

    Cheers

    SE
  • #21
    They were just talking about the text that was under the smuggler block seen in our dec 3rd smuggler tree article. Basically they were talking about themes or things that the certain class/sub classes have as seen in our past articles. Not sure why that quote has been taken to mean other things but we are hopefully clearing that up with every article we publish.
  • #22
    Thanks sado.

    Are you saying that these themes (luck, recklessness, opportunity, and cowboy) did not originate from BioWare/LucasArts, but rather from you DH guys speculating?

    The GameSpot article makes them sound pretty "official" and I couldn't find anything mentioned about them in your Dec 3rd "Smuggler Class Trees" article, nor did anything show up through your search function.

    Again, sorry if I just misunderstood you and/or missed something obvious, just want to make sure I got this right.

    Cheers

    SE
  • #23
    That's not what I was saying at all...

    The place where we got the picture in the smuggler tree article was from the LA presentation itself, we just made a clone of the slide from memory. What was not included in that picture was the text under the smuggler box at the top, which gamespot included in their article. That is where the content you were referring to was seen.

    We did not include that text in our class tree article because it was the same general description that we have had for months on the class. The same luck, cowboy, and other themes can be seen in the holonet as descriptors for the smuggler class.
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.

Most Commented Articles